Stephen Hawking, Michael Shermer, and Beliefs
Posted by Emmet in Season Two, Topic on March 21st, 2011 |No Comments

The models generated by biochemical processes in our brains constitute “reality.” None of us can ever be completely sure that the world really is as it appears, or if our minds have unconsciously imposed a misleading pattern on the data. I call this belief-dependent realism. In my forthcoming book, The Believing Brain, I demonstrate the myriad ways that our beliefs shape, influence, and even control everything we think, do, and say about the world. The power of belief is so strong that we typically form our beliefs first, then construct a rationale for holding those beliefs after the fact. I claim that the only escape from this epistemological trap is science. Flawed as it may be because it is conducted by scientists who have their own set of beliefs determining their reality, science itself has a set of methods to bypass the cognitive biases that so cripple our grasp of the reality that really does exist out there. ~ Michael Shermer Author of The Believing Brain.
I am very intrigued by many of the ideas put forth in this article. The beginning ties anyone with a seeking mind in with the beautiful description of how we receive and interpret the environment through our senses and brain. However, I must disagree with the author slightly in that I do not think our brains have the incredible crippling bias that Shermer references.
Science is extraordinary. Yet what runs science but human minds? When I look at reality I have to think that most of what I see is fairly accurate. From a philosophical standpoint we must come to the conclusion that we can never know exactly what reality is without altering that reality or without some degradation of the information we are getting about it. But I choose to assume that what my senses take in are as close to the truth as I may ever come. And in fact I can rely on my senses pretty well. Things behave in patterns that I have learned over my life. Other people can verify for me that there is in fact a computer screen in front of my eyes!
What I am getting at is that I am not a scientist nor are most people. Yet we can use logic and reason along with our senses and memory to make a pretty good working model of the world and that is what people have been doing for millenia. Observing and comparing notes. I am not trying to go on an attack on science. However, scientists study things that may or may not have a direct impact on our daily lives. Yet you and I can study and observe and make some logical conclusions about the world we live in that might make a vast difference in how we view our own realities. I look to science for guidance but I also consult a whole host of sources in order for me to make a a choice and apply it in my life.
It really all comes down to belief. Beliefs have the power to cloud our view of reality or tune us into it even more deeply. Even science has its doctrine. So I believe that it is even more important than science to focus on our own beliefs and realize that they are what inform our reality most yet that we can choose to have our observations shape them. One can either mold reality to their beliefs or allow reality to inform and inspire their thoughts and beliefs.
Tags: Author, Belief, Believe, Bias, Biochemical Processes, Brain, Brains, Cognitive Biases, Degradation, Focus, Forthcoming Book, Human, idea, Ideas, influence, Information, Life, Man, Michael Shermer, People, Philosophical Standpoint, Philosophy, Philosophy Of Science, Question, Questions, Radical Philosophy, Rationale, Religious Belief, Science, Scientist, Scientists, Season Two, Self, Senses, Skeptic, Space, Stephen Hawking, Ted, Topic, Truth, Users, WorldRelated Posts
- Dubunking the Bunk
- Science and Morality
- Atheisism & Biological Design
- The Story of Stuff
- Technology & eLearning
- Pollution

Or, at least, this is true if you live in the
The
Recently, major
